2025 ARCHIVES
Wednesday, March 12
1:30 pmRegistration Open
Chairperson's Remarks
Larry Kessler, ScD, Professor, Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington; Deputy Chair, MCED Consortium
One Year from the NHS Galleri Report Out: Will Half a Loaf Be Enough for Policy Decisions?
Multi-Cancer Early Detection tests (MCEDs) hold promise to change how we screen for cancers. The gold standard for evaluating cancer screening tests are expensive and lengthy randomized clinical trials with a cancer mortality endpoint. A major randomized trial of a leading MCED assay will deliver results on reductions in late-stage incidence in 2026. We suggest assembling relevant data to allow population implementation of these tests, including data from case-control data on test characteristics, real-world implementation studies, modeling studies, post market studies, and the collection of non-mortality endpoints of primary importance to patients.
Predicting the Outcome of the NHS Galleri Trial
Ruth Etzioni, PhD, Professor, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutch Cancer Center
The NHS Galleri trial is an unprecedented cancer screening trial that is ongoing in the UK. It will evaluate the effect of annual screening new multicancer screening test—the Galleri test—on the incidence of late-stage disease among the targeted cancers over a follow-up interval of only 3 years. We predict the outcome of the Galleri trial using a model of cancer natural history that projects late-stage reduction using a test with a specified sensitivity for each targeted cancer. We present a range of uncertainty over the predicted results and examine how the predictions might change under different trial durations and timeliness of treatment for screen-detected disease.
What the MCED World Needs Now
While randomized controlled trials have been the standard for evaluating cancer screening technologies for several decades, there are challenges in bringing such studies to the fore regarding evaluation of multi-cancer early detection tests (MCEDs). This panel will review what studies need to be done in the short-to-moderate term, with what populations, with what endpoints, and what are the highest priority questions to ask of MCEDs now to assess readiness for implementation at the population level.
Tomasz M. Beer, MD, CMO & Vice President, Multi-Cancer Early Detection, Exact Sciences
Megan P. Hall, PhD, Vice President, Medical Affairs, GRAIL
Craig Eagle, PhD, CMO, Guardant Health
3:35 pmDessert Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing
Tech Trends in Precision Medicine
Jonathan D. Grinstein, PhD, North America Editor, Inside Precision Medicine
Leading technology companies will discuss future trends, needs, and solutions needed to drive precision medicine forward, including innovation in genomics and diagnostics, artificial intelligence and digital tech, multiomic analysis, biomarkers, and clinical trials.
Aaron Sin, Senior Director Research & Technology Development, Diagnostics & Regulated Materials, MilliporeSigma
Damon Hostin, Head, Global Market Access, Illumina, Inc.
Shawn Fahl, VP Lab Operations, Cell Services & R&D, Biospecimens, Discovery Life Sciences
Shawn Carlson, Vice President, Head of Market Access, Roche Diagnostics
Suzanne Belinson, PhD, Vice President, Commercial Markets, Tempus AI
4:45 pmClose of Day
Thursday, March 13
8:00 amRegistration and Morning Coffee
Sam Hanash, MD, PhD, Director, Red & Charline McCombs Institute; Evelyn & Sol Rubenstein Distinguished Chair, Cancer Prevention; Professor, Clinical Cancer Prevention-Research, Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Biomarker Trajectories for Cancer Screening and Early Detection
Detecting cancer at an early stage requires regular screening. Establishing trajectories of biomarkers over time as part of multi-cancer early detection blood tests improves performance compared to a single threshold tests. Evidence to this effect will be presented.
Perspectives on Clinical Adoption Barriers to Blood-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests across Stakeholders
Arushi Agarwal, Partner, Health Advances LLC
Our team conducted a survey amongst healthcare providers (HCPs), payers, and patients within the U.S. health system to understand the current utilization of cancer screening tests and the anticipated barriers to widespread adoption of blood-based MCED tests. The results indicated significant enthusiasm for MCED adoption, but also highlighted a number of barriers that still exist before the value proposition of MCEDs can be truly realized.
Policy Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Blood-Based Cancer Screening
Emma Alme, PhD, Senior Director, Public Policy, Guardant Health
Even once they have FDA approval, blood-based screening tests face multiple policy barriers that can impact their adoption as a cancer screening tool. This session will discuss the regulatory and reimbursement challenges that influence patient access to and provider adoption of innovative screening tests and explore potential solutions.
Implementation of MCED Screening: The Importance of Broad Access
10:35 pmClose of Conference
Conference Programs